We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 30 January 14
PANAMAX MARKET IS SOFTENING ON LESS ACTIVITY IN BOTH HEMISPHERES - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
In the Atlantic rates have been slowly sliding but ows can still achieve decent money for TArv´s. USG positions still being fixed in re ...
Thursday, 30 January 14
TANKER PROFITABILITY IS THE 'MILLION-DOLLAR' QUESTION FOR SHIP OWNERS THIS YEAR - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The tanker market conditions are expected to remain challenging throughout the year for tanker owners, but even more pressing will be the issue of a ...
Tuesday, 28 January 14
GLOBAL COKING AND STEAM COAL PRODUCTION HAVE GROWN 2% TO 3% TO ABOUT 7.1 BILLION TONNES AS OF THE END OF 2013 - VDKI
COALspot.com (Press Release): Initial figures on the world hard coal market at the VDKi ((Association of Coal Importers - German) New Year’s R ...
Tuesday, 28 January 14
AUSTRALIAN NEWCASTLE PORT'S WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS JUMP 13.75% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 27 January 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled ...
Tuesday, 28 January 14
RESOURCE NATIONALISM OR PROTECTIONISM FOR THE MINING AND EXTRACTIVES INDUSTRY - JOHN WHITTAKER & MICHAEL SWANGARD
Resource nationalism or protectionism for the mining and extractives industry as well as soft commodities sector and the oil industry.
‘Res ...
|
|
|
Showing 3876 to 3880 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PTC India Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Economic Council, Georgia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
