We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 28 January 14
DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS RETREAT TO OLD 'HABITS', REFUSING TO DEMOLISH OLD VESSELS, THREATENING MARKET RECOVERY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
If one thing is clear as we reflect on the 2013 shipping markets, it's that ship owners took advantage of low prices, in order to acquire newer ton ...
Monday, 27 January 14
MERCATOR SINGAPORE REPORTS 52% INCREASE IN EBITDA FOR Q3 FY 2014 AS COMPARED TO PREVIOUS QUARTER
COALspot.com: Mercator Lines (Singapore) Limited, a leading Indian-owned international dry bulk shipping company that operates a fleet of fourteen d ...
Monday, 27 January 14
13TH CLEAN COAL FORUM 2014
COALspot.com: (Press Release) - Produced by CDMC Events, The 13th Clean Coal Forum 2014 will be held on June 12 &13 2014 in Beijing, China. We a ...
Monday, 27 January 14
Q3 & Q4 API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO REMAIN WEAK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1 14 delivery lost 4.45 percent month on month and closed at US$ 79.05 per mt as on Frid ...
Monday, 27 January 14
Q3 2014 SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST GROUND, ENDS AT $60 PMT
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery lost 2.29% pmt month on month on Friday 24 January 2014. Th ...
|
|
|
Showing 3881 to 3885 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The University of Queensland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
