We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 06 February 14
PANAMAX: FAR EAST IS ALMOST ABSENT AND ATLANTIC ON SLOW STEAM
Handy
Due to ongoing Chinese New Year the market is still quiet. Slowly we can see some fresh coal cargos entering the market with second half Feb/ ...
Wednesday, 05 February 14
DRY BULK MARKET HAS LOST FURTHER GROUND THIS PAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market has lost further ground this past week as activity ex-Far East disappeared into the Chinese holidays and owners id ...
Wednesday, 05 February 14
MARKET INSIGHT - TASOS PAPADOPOULOS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
COALspot.com: Let's take a break from market prospects, numbers, order book etc. and shed some light on the conclusions of ...
Tuesday, 04 February 14
NEWCASTLE PORT'S WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS HIT NEW HIGH OF 3.53 MMT
COALspot.com: In the week ended 3 February 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled ...
Monday, 03 February 14
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP GAINED WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – Swaps prices gained for thermal coal loading from Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the fuel, according SGX.
...
|
|
|
Showing 3866 to 3870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
