We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 February 14
2013 WAS THE YEAR OF PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDING - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
COALspot.com: People say that money makes the world go round. Well, can it be that it’s the other way around? Is it possible that money needs ...
Tuesday, 11 February 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAP SHOWS STRONG GROWTH IN 2014 SECOND HALF
COALspot.com – Swaps prices slide for thermal coal loading from Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the fuel, according SGX.
T ...
Tuesday, 11 February 14
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS SLIDE AROUND 15% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 10 February 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled ...
Tuesday, 11 February 14
SHIP OWNERS INVEST IN 447 NEWBUILDINGS AND SECOND HAND VESSELS DURING JANUARY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite a rough start to the year for the dry bulk freight market and lackluster performance from most other shipping sub-segments, ship owners have ...
Monday, 10 February 14
Q1 2015, API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AROUND $ 2 HIGHER THAN Q2 14 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 delivery lost 2.61 percent month on month and closed at US$ 77.28 per mt as on Frid ...
|
|
|
Showing 3856 to 3860 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- White Energy Company Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The University of Queensland
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|