We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 10 February 14
SUPRAMAX STILL AT AROUND US$ 5K + BB 50K DELIVERY KALIMANTAN FOR A TRIP TO INDIA - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The BDI was down by 1.71 pct and closed at 1091 points week ended 7 February 2014. The BDI seemed to reach the bottom as the cape inde ...
Saturday, 08 February 14
U.S PRODUCED 84.5 MMMST OF COAL IN JANUARY; 2.05% UP MONTH ON MONTH, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 07 February 14
DRY BULK MARKET ON ' REVERSE' MODE DUE TO CHINESE HOLIDAYS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has kept its uninspiring mood throughout yet another week, with the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) hovering slightly above the 1,000-poi ...
Thursday, 06 February 14
INDONESIA'S BAN ON THE EXPORT OF RAW MINERAL ORES COMES INTO FORCE - INCE & CO
COALspot.com: On 12 January 2014, the ban on the export of unprocessed mineral ores came into effect in Indonesia. This ban enforces the Mining Law ...
Thursday, 06 February 14
THE WORLD LARGEST COAL EXPORTER SHIPPED AROUND 35.90 MMT OF COAL IN DECEMBER 2013
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world 4th largest coal producer and the Global largest multi grade coal exporter shipped around $2* billion worth ...
|
|
|
Showing 3861 to 3865 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Coal Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
