We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 May 14
DRY BULK MARKET SHOWING SIGNS OF COMEBACK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market which has been hovering below the 1,000-point market (BDI) during the past couple of weeks, could be exhibiting signs of a s ...
Thursday, 01 May 14
INDONESIA EXPORT BAN POINTS TO QUESTIONS OVER CHINA'S LONG-TERM BAUXITE SUPPLY - WOOD MACKENZIE
China’s Bauxite demand forecast to reach 240 million tonnes by 2030
In light of the Indonesian mineral ore ban that came into force o ...
Thursday, 01 May 14
DRY BULK MARKET STILL REELING UNDER PRESSURE FROM VARIOUS FACTORS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market's revival is still overdue, as the industry's benchmark, the BDI is still lagging below the 1,000-point mark. In fac ...
Wednesday, 30 April 14
FREIGHT MARKET FOR DRY BULKERS STILL REMAINS WEAK - INTERMODAL
One week after the Easter holiday and the celebration for the resurrection of Christ, everybody expected to see a similar sign of a revival in t ...
Tuesday, 29 April 14
Q4 SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED US$ 1.07 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q2’ 2014 gain on month and on week according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports rele ...
|
|
|
Showing 3726 to 3730 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
