We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 May 14
SUB BIT-FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS LOST GROUND LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on day, week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports ...
Monday, 05 May 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR AVERAGE Q3 14 DELIVERIES: LOST 0.82% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 0.82 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.20 per mt as o ...
Sunday, 04 May 14
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATES ARE SHOWING POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com: The freight market is seems to be some recovery as cape index has increased by 7.84 pct week on week. Cape index closed at 1829 po ...
Friday, 02 May 14
ADARO ENERGY STARTS YEAR 2014 WELL DESPITE CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS
COALspot.com: Adaro Energy, the second largest Indonesian coal miner's revenue increased 14% to US$ 845 million due to higher sales volume, ...
Friday, 02 May 14
US WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION RELATIVELY FLAT AT -0.1%, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.0 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
|
|
|
Showing 3721 to 3725 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Australian Coal Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PTC India Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
