We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 08 May 14
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE IN MAY CRASHES THROUGH $74
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has revised down again the coal bench mark price by US$ 1.21 / MT to ...
Wednesday, 07 May 14
THE DRY BULK MARKET HAS NOTED ANOTHER WEEKLY POSITIVE GAIN
Chartering (Wet: Softer- / Dry: Stable+)
The Dry Bulk market has noted another weekly positive gain, driven by the Capesize segment, but we ne ...
Wednesday, 07 May 14
SGX ENHANCES ITS COMMODITIES PRODUCT OFFERING
COALspot.com: SGX is building up its bulk commodity product offerings with 9 more derivative contracts over the next 2 months, subject to regula ...
Tuesday, 06 May 14
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORT SLIPS 7.92% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 5 May 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland ...
Monday, 05 May 14
HUANENG CLEAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE HAS CONFIRMED TO SPEAK AT CCF2014
Press Release: Produced by CDMC Events, The 13th Clean Coal Forum 2014 will be held on June 12,13, 2014 in Beijing, China. We are glad to invite ...
|
|
|
Showing 3716 to 3720 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
|
| |
| |
|
