We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 25 April 14
2ND MYANMAR ELECTRIC POWER CONVENTION 2014 IS THE GATEWAY TO MYANMAR POWER INDUSTRY!
Press Release: 2nd Myanmar Electric Power Convention (MEPC) 2014 is scheduled on 21-23 October, 2014 at Traders Hotel in Yangon, Myanmar. MEPC o ...
Friday, 25 April 14
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR NEW TRACTION - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market seems to have gained its footing after the past few dissapointing weeks, during which the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) shedded mos ...
Thursday, 24 April 14
HANDY : A FLOW OF FRESH REQUIREMENTS LIFTING THE PACIFIC SLOWLY TO US$ 10-11 K BSS SINGAPORE FOR COAL ROUNDS
Handy
There is still no place to hide in the Atlantic for the smaller but flexible sizes. Slow and weak seems to be the headlines, although th ...
Wednesday, 23 April 14
EUROPE WOULD BE HARD PRESSED TO REPLACE RUSSIAN GAS, FITCH RATINGS SAYS
A ban on Russian gas imports to the EU would cause substantial disruption to Europe's economy and industry, Fitch Ratings says. In the immed ...
Wednesday, 23 April 14
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR LOW VOLATILE BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com : Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd. has invited bids through International open bidding for 90,000 Metric Tons (MT) of low volatile bit ...
|
|
|
Showing 3736 to 3740 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
|
| |
| |
|