We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 May 14
COAL PRICES IN CHINA HAVE DROPPED TO THEIR LOWEST LEVELS SINCE END-2008
COALspot.com: Coal prices in China have dropped to their lowest levels since end-2008, Fitch says in its latest rating report on one of the coal ...
Wednesday, 14 May 14
ALMOST THROUGH THE HALF OF THE YEAR, THE DRY BULK INDEX SHOW SIGNS OF WEAKNESS; CREATING TO BOTH EXISTING SHIP OWNERS AND POTENTIAL INVESTORS A LOT OF INSECURITY - PANOS MAKRINOS
Almost through the half of the year, the overall shipping market and more specifically the Dry Bulk Index show signs of weakness, creating to bo ...
Tuesday, 13 May 14
NPC COAL EXPORT VOLUMES PLUNGE TO 2.48 MMT WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 12 May 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Quee ...
Tuesday, 13 May 14
YET ANOTHER POSIDONIA EXHIBITION IS ON ITS WAY - INTERMODAL
With less than a month to go before another Posidonia exhibition starts and all the parties and celebrations get under way we thought that it wo ...
Monday, 12 May 14
TAIPOWER TO IMPORT AROUND 1 MMT OF SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL DURING AUGUST 2014 THROUGH NOVEMBER 2014
COALspot.com - Taiwan Power Company intends to procure 1.050 million tons of sub-bituminous coal for Taipower thermal power plant through open t ...
|
|
|
Showing 3706 to 3710 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parliament of New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
