We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 18 May 14
FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO BE FIRM NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was steady with the BDI was closed slightly higher at 1027 points or up 3.00 pct week on week.
The Cape ...
Friday, 16 May 14
KOMIPO IS LOOKING FOR 60K MT OF LOW VOLATILE BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com : Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd. has invited bids through International open bidding for 60,000 Metric Tons (MT) of low volatile bitumi ...
Friday, 16 May 14
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED APPROXIMATELY 18.9 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Thursday, 15 May 14
PANAMAX : SHORT PERIOD UP TO ONE YEAR REPORTED IN THE 12.000-12.500 RANGE - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The Supra and handy market seems to be affected by the recent holidays in Singapore which still relatively quiet. There are some Indo / ...
Thursday, 15 May 14
USA COAL CONFERENCE
Press Release: IHS Inc. (NYSE: IHS), the leading global source of information and analysis, will host the Coal USA Conference, June 18-20, 2014, ...
|
|
|
Showing 3701 to 3705 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
