We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 20 May 14
NEWCASTLE'S COAL EXPORT VOLUME UP 39.11 PERCENT WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 19 May 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, ...
Tuesday, 20 May 14
DRY BULK MARKET TO IMPROVE OVER THE COURSE OF 2014, BUT OVERSUPPLY STILL AN ISSUE SAYS BIMCO'S CHIEF SHIPPING ANALYST
As a gruelling first quarter edges closer to the end, dry bulk ship owners are looking at an improved second quarter demand, which, coupled with sl ...
Tuesday, 20 May 14
DRY BULK MARKET IS BOUND FOR A RECOVERY CLAIMS PARAGON SHIPPING'S HEAD MICHAEL BODOUROGLOU
The dry bulk market is bound for a recovery in the coming weeks, as the market will be better balanced, said Mr. Michael Bodouroglou, Chairman and ...
Monday, 19 May 14
INDO COAL SWAPS FOR AVERAGE Q3' 2014 DELIVERY LOST ON WEEK AND ON MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports release ...
Monday, 19 May 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL LOST 2.49% MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 2.49 percent month on month and closed at US$ 74.35 per mt as on F ...
|
|
|
Showing 3696 to 3700 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The University of Queensland
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- White Energy Company Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
