We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 23 May 14
DRY BULK NEWBUILDING CANCELLATIONS COULD HELP SUPPORT MARKET IN THE COMING WEEKS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market's demise over the past few months maybe has come as a surprise to many, but analysts and shipbrokers are looking forward to ...
Thursday, 22 May 14
HEAR SUCCESSFUL CASE STUDIES FROM 10 INDEPENDENT UNCONVENTIONAL GAS OPERATORS
Unconventional Gas Asia 2014 will provide a unique opportunity for Asia’s unconventional gas leaders to share their experience and expertise ...
Thursday, 22 May 14
CNPC-GAZPROM DEAL A MEDIUM - TERM POSITIVE FOR CHINA'S GAS SECTOR
Fitch Ratings says a 30-year deal in which Russia's OAO Gazprom (BBB/Negative) will supply gas to China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC; A ...
Thursday, 22 May 14
CAPESIZE : RATES ARE STILL UNDER PRESSURE
Handy
A quiet start into the week in Far East, some fresh Indonesian coal order in the market. For trips within S.E. Asia, Supras are trading aro ...
Wednesday, 21 May 14
SHIPPING: MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
The recent revision by the OECD of its global growth forecast has sparked a debate as to the potential outcome these new figures will have on seabo ...
|
|
|
Showing 3691 to 3695 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
