We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 17 February 22
MAJOR INSTITUTIONS PROVIDED OVER $1.5 TRLN TO COAL SECTOR IN 2019-2021, SAYS NGO GROUP - REUTERS
Financial institutions channelled more than $1.5 trillion into the coal industry in loans and underwriting from January 2019 to November 2021, even ...
Thursday, 17 February 22
APAC THERMAL COAL PRICES TO EASE ON END OF INDONESIA EXPORT BAN - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings-Shanghai/Singapore-14 February 2022: APAC thermal coal prices are likely to come under pressure in the near term due to seasonally we ...
Tuesday, 15 February 22
IS ANOTHER COAL SHORTAGE CRISIS LOOMING OVER INDIA? - BUSINESS STANDARD
In December last year, the Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (FIMI) shot off a letter to the Prime Minister claiming that the coal crisis was ...
Tuesday, 15 February 22
THERMAL COAL'S RECORD PRICE RUN MAY END UP ITS OWN WORST ENEMY - REUTERS
The price of benchmark Australian thermal coal rose last week to trade near record highs, providing a short-term boost to producers but increasing ...
Thursday, 10 February 22
INDONESIA: COAL EXPORT BAN - SKULD
Indonesia's coal export ban in the light of force majeure and off-hire clauses
In January 2022, Indonesia, the world's biggest exporte ...
|
|
|
Showing 346 to 350 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
