We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 February 22
RENEWABLES ON THE RISE, COAL CONTINUOUSLY FALLING - EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Although oil (34.5%) and natural gas (23.7%) were still the most important fuel sources in the EU energy mix in 2020, renewable energy’s shar ...
Thursday, 03 February 22
COAL SHORTAGE NOW AT ALARMING LEVELS, SAY ALUMINIUM PRODUCERS - IANS
With no relief in sight despite coal stocks running critically low and production disruptions looming across the Indian aluminium sector, the Alumi ...
Wednesday, 02 February 22
HIGH COKING COAL PRICES PROVIDE GLIMPSE INTO STEELMAKING'S FUTURE - MCKINSEY
Last year was a volatile one in global commodity markets. Demand for coking coal, an essential raw material in the production of steel, was extreme ...
Wednesday, 02 February 22
INDONESIA'S RESTRICTIONS ON COMMODITIES RATTLE MARKETS, MORE MOVES LIKELY - REUTERS
In just the first month of this year, Indonesian policymakers have rattled global markets with restrictions on some of its biggest commodities expo ...
Wednesday, 02 February 22
CHINA'S TOP COAL PRODUCER FORECASTS 28 PCT PROFIT GROWTH IN 2021 - XINHUA
China Shenhua Energy Company Limited, one of the country’s biggest coal producers, said its net profits are expected to jump by 28 percent in ...
|
|
|
Showing 356 to 360 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Coal Association
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
|
| |
| |
|
