We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 08 March 22
RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT ADDS IMPETUS TO ASIA'S ENERGY TRANSITION - IEEFA
Clean energy alternatives are a crucial hedge against future disruptions in global commodity markets
Russia’s invasion of Ukra ...
Tuesday, 08 March 22
THE HIGH COST OF INDONESIA’S DOWNSTREAM COAL PROJECTS IS UNDERESTIMATED - IEEFA
Three Indonesian ministries have come up with a DME purchase price of US$378/tonne fixed for 20 years compared to IEEFA’s US$601/tonne estima ...
Wednesday, 02 March 22
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The escalating confrontation between Russia and Ukraine has the potential to disrupt global order and set the world back a few decades. While count ...
Tuesday, 22 February 22
THE DRY BULK MARKET HAS MOVED ON A POSITIVE TRACK - ALLIED
The dry bulk market has moved on a positive track as of the past couple of weeks or so. Following the typical softening in freight conditions durin ...
Tuesday, 22 February 22
CHINA'S DAILY OUTPUT OF COAL REBOUNDS TO OVER 12 MLN TONNES - REUTERS
China’s coal output returned to more than 12 million tonnes per day as of Feb. 20, the country’s state planner said on Monday, a level ...
|
|
|
Showing 341 to 345 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
