We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 March 22
MEMR OF INDONESIA HAS FIXED COAL PRICE AT US$ 90 PER TONNE FOR DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES EXCEPT SMELTER INDUSTRIES; FOR PLN USD 70 IS APPLICABLE
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) Arifin Tasrif has set the selling price of coal for domestic, industrial except metal processing an ...
Monday, 21 March 22
A FORCE MAJEURE TO BE RECKONED WITH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Sanctions cause payment confusion
This dispute in MUR Shipping BV v. RTI Ltd [2022] EWHC 467 (Comm) related to an owner’s purported exercis ...
Monday, 21 March 22
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT UP 10.3 PCT IN FIRST TWO MONTHS - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output posted fast growth in the first two months of 2022, while coal imports continued to shrink, official data showed.
...
Tuesday, 15 March 22
INDUSTRY VETERANS & ORGANIZATIONS HONOURED WITH THE PRESTIGIOUS SHIPTEK INTERNATIONAL AWARDS 2022
Press Release: The 15th edition of the prestigious ShipTek International Conference & Awards 2022 concluded successfully from March 7th - 8th 2 ...
Tuesday, 15 March 22
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT GROWS TO STABILIZE MARKET SUPPLY - XINHUA
China’s coal market has seen growth in output since late February amid the country’s efforts to stabilize production and ensure supply, ...
|
|
|
Showing 336 to 340 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PTC India Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- The University of Queensland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|