We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 30 December 14
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION ALMOST FLAT AT -0.2%
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Monday, 29 December 14
CHINESE COAL IMPORTS: REGULATORY RISKS? - CLARKSONS
In recent years, Chinese seaborne coal imports have surged, registering average growth of 67% p.a. between 2009 and 2013 to total 265mt. However, t ...
Monday, 29 December 14
BULK MARKET ENDS YEAR ON SOUR NOTE, SHIPBROKER SEES 'BUMPY ROAD AHEAD' - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
2014 was supposed to be the year that the dry bulk market would stage a comeback and a sustainable one for that matter. However, while for the most ...
Monday, 29 December 14
Q1'15 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $59.42
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased by US$ 3.51 (-5.58%) month over month and US$ 0.08 (-0.13%) ...
Monday, 29 December 14
SGX'S FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS IMPROVED W-O-W, LOST M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.44 per MT (-2.73%) month over month and gained US$ 0.36 (+0.71%) ...
|
|
|
Showing 3286 to 3290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
