We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 December 14
SHIPS FACE LOWER SULPHUR FUEL REQUIREMENTS IN EMISSION CONTROL AREAS FROM 1 JANUARY 2015 - IMO
Ships trading in designated emission control areas will have to use on board fuel oil with a sulphur content of no more than 0.10% from 1 January 2 ...
Wednesday, 24 December 14
CAPE DEMAND WAS STILL EXTREMELY SOFT THIS PAST WEEK ACROSS BOTH BASINS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The performance of the Dry Bulk market, which found itself in desperate search of support for yet another week, has left very little ...
Wednesday, 24 December 14
MARKET INSIGHT - JOHN N. COTZIAS, INTERMODAL SNP BROKER
The year is coming to an end, and we should be able to assess if this was a good year, a bad year, or even a lousy one? The answer clearly de ...
Tuesday, 23 December 14
Q1'15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP GAINED 48 CENTS IN ONE WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and gained week over week and day on day.
The Q1 swap has lo ...
Tuesday, 23 December 14
Q4'15 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS FALL $ 3.85 IN A MONTH
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 2.13 (-3.17%) month on month ...
|
|
|
Showing 3291 to 3295 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The University of Queensland
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
