We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 January 15
FIVE ENERGY SURPRISES FOR 2015: THE POSSIBLE AND THE IMPROBABLE - KURT COBB
The coming year is likely to be as full of surprises in the field of energy as 2014 was. We just don't know which surprises! I am not predictin ...
Monday, 05 January 15
THE SHIPPING MARKET IN 2014 AND LOOKING FORWARD - BIMCO
2014 started with plenty of optimism for a considerably better global economy and an improved shipping market. Things turned out somewhat different ...
Monday, 05 January 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q1'15 DELIVERY CLOSED US$ 0.45 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2'15 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 0.60 per MT (-1.15%) month over month and gained US$ 0.02 (+0.04%) ...
Sunday, 04 January 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX CONTINUES ITS DECLINE IN 2015
Wish you all a very Happy New Year 2015. The last report was dated 19th Dec 2014 and due to Christmas and new year holidays no reports were publish ...
Saturday, 03 January 15
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION FELL 11.2% TO 17.6 MMST WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.6 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3276 to 3280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
|
| |
| |
|
