We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 23 December 14
SHIPOWNERS ARE FINALIZING MORE DEALS AS YEAR END COMES CLOSER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS WORLDWIDE
With the 2014 year just a few days before waving goodbye, shipowners are looking to close their pending deals in both the newbuilding and S&P m ...
Monday, 22 December 14
Q2'15 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED $ 0.30 LOWER THAN Q1'15 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased by US$ 3.67 (-5.81%) month over month and US$ 0.35 (-0.58%) ...
Monday, 22 December 14
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS ARE HEADING SOUTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.71 per MT (-3.24%) and closed at US$ 51.02 on 19 December month ...
Sunday, 21 December 14
PANAMAX COAL FREIGHT FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA FALLS FURTHER
COALspot.com: The BDI continued its fall as cape index lost heavily week on week.
The BDI was down 6.95 percent week over week and closed at 8 ...
Friday, 19 December 14
HOW WILL LOWER BUNKER PRICES AFFECT THE SUBSTANTIAL OVERCAPACITY IN DRY BULK MARKET? - BIMCO
As bunker fuel costs have come down from USD 600 per tonnes to USD 330 per tonnes in the past 6 months, much talk about increased ship speed have s ...
|
|
|
Showing 3296 to 3300 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
