We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 19 August 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS CONTINUE FLAT TREND LINE THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and flat week over week, this past week.
The 4Q swap was decli ...
Tuesday, 18 August 15
DRY BULK: MARKETS HAVE CONTINUED TO BE SEVERELY CHALLENGED - CLARKSONS
The dry bulk markets have continued to be severely challenged with freight rates falling during the period to below operating expense. The Baltic D ...
Tuesday, 18 August 15
1Q'16 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FALLS BELOW $54 A TON
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Tuesday, 18 August 15
2Q' 16 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $43 PER MT W/E 14 AUGUST
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 1.08 per MT (-2.46%) month over month to US$ 42.82 per mt. The swap ...
Monday, 17 August 15
TROUBLED DRY BULK MARKET FACES TURMOIL AS CHINESE COAL IMPORTS REMAIN WEAK - BIMCO
The demand for coal in China continues to diminish. So much in fact that India is expected to succeed China as the world’s largest imp ...
|
|
|
Showing 2861 to 2865 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Planning Commission, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
