We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 19 July 22
DRY BULK MARKET: CAPESIZE MARKET FIRMS THIS WEEK - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Capesize
Firmer sentiment across both basins pushed the Capesize 5TC route average above the $20,000 threshold this week, closing at $24,209. A ...
Tuesday, 19 July 22
WHY SHIPPING MIGHT BE ABOUT TO GET A LITTLE BIT SLOWER - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
If shipping is the beating heart of global trade, its pulse is about to get slower.
Faced with uncertainty about which fuels to use in the long ...
Tuesday, 19 July 22
GERMANY'S INCREASED COAL, OIL USE WILL BE TEMPORARY, SCHOLZ SAYS - CNBC
Chancellor Olaf Scholz says Germany’s decision to reactivate coal and oil-fired power plants to relieve energy shortages because of the war i ...
Tuesday, 19 July 22
INDONESIA REMOVES PALM OIL EXPORT LEVY UNTIL AUG. 31 - REUTERS
Indonesia has scrapped its export levy for all palm oil products until Aug. 31 in a fresh attempt to boost exports and ease high inventories, finan ...
Tuesday, 19 July 22
CHINA'S JUNE DAILY COAL OUTPUT JUMPS ON PEAK SUMMER DEMAND - REUTERS
China’s daily coal output in June rose 6.6 per cent from a month earlier as miners cranked up output ahead of peak summer temperatures, when ...
|
|
|
Showing 286 to 290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
|
| |
| |
|
