We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 October 15
Q1 & Q2 2016 DELIVERY SWAPS DECLINED M-M AND W-W THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2015 delivery decreased $0.36 per ton (0.85%) month over month to US$ 42.12 per ton. The ...
Monday, 05 October 15
Q1' 16 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED US$ 48.05 PER TON
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down US$ 0.47 (0.96 %) per ton month over month.
A commodity swap is ...
Monday, 05 October 15
SMALL DECLINE IN 2014 SHIP OPERATING COSTS - MOORE STEPHENS
Total annual operating costs in the shipping industry fell by an average of 0.8% in 2014. This compares with the 0.3% average fall in costs recorde ...
Sunday, 04 October 15
THE INDO-INDIA FREIGHT MARKET REMAINS UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com: The BDI closed on Friday (2 Oct 2015) at 889 points, down by 54 points compared to previous Friday's closing ( 24 Sept 2015) of 9 ...
Friday, 02 October 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES DECREASED THIS WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.5 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2786 to 2790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
|
| |
| |
|
