We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 October 15
U.S. COAL EXPORTS FOR THE FIRST SEVEN MONTHS DOWN 21 PER CENT COMPARED WITH THE SAME PERIOD IN 2014 - EIA
Coal Supply
Lower U.S.’s domestic coal consumption and reduced exports contribute to a forecast decline of 89 million short tons (M ...
Wednesday, 07 October 15
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Sale and Purchase activity during the first three quarters of 2015 and more specifically during the summer season has been rather remarkable. 421 v ...
Wednesday, 07 October 15
INDONESIA COAL SWAPS HAVE CONTINUED TO DECLINE, FALLING ALMOST 7% M-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q4 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q4 swap declined $ 2.23 (-5.51%) per t ...
Tuesday, 06 October 15
THE IMPACT OF LOW OIL PRICE ON THE SHIPPING INDUSTRY - LITERATED
The fall in global oil prices over the last one year has been beneficial to the shipping industry. The demand for oil tankers has picked up and the ...
Tuesday, 06 October 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS PLUNGE MORE THAN 6 PER CENT M-M
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q4' 2015 declined week over week and month over month.
The Q4 swap was down US$ ...
|
|
|
Showing 2781 to 2785 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|