We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 12 October 15
DRY BULK SHIPPING: MARKETS ARE SLOWLY IMPROVING FROM A VERY LOW LEVEL AS THE DEMAND SIDE FALTERS - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market is in the midst of a shift in demand patterns, which coupled with a tonnage supply overhang, has been facing headwinds over the ...
Monday, 12 October 15
BDI WEIGHED DOWN BY CAPE
COALspot.com: The BDI (Baltic Dry Index) has come back down again this week. The BDI is a benchmark index used to assess the overall cost of moving ...
Sunday, 11 October 15
TANKER SHIPPING: MORE OPTIMISM IN SIGHT FOR TANKERS IN THE WINTER SEASON - BIMCO
Demand:
2015 has been the year of the tanker. The fundamental improvements with slow supply-side growth for some years coupled with low oil pri ...
Friday, 09 October 15
US WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT UP 1.2 PERCENT TO 17.7 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.7 million shor ...
Thursday, 08 October 15
CAPESIZE: MOST PEOPLE AGREE A SPIKE IN RATES WILL HAPPEN; WHEN, HOW LONG AND HOW SUBSTANTIAL? - FEARNLEYS
Cape
Depressives start of the fourth quarter, with c3 approaching USD 12 pmt and c5 presently in the mind 5's. According to Fearnleys ship br ...
|
|
|
Showing 2776 to 2780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
