We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 28 September 15
CAPESIZE FLEET INCREASES BY JUST 1 VESSEL DURING LAST 12 MONTHS, IN POSITIVE SIGN FOR DRY BULK SHIPPING MARKET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
After a rather tumultuous period, the shipping industry and more particular the dry bulk market has started to adjust to the new realities of globa ...
Monday, 28 September 15
Q1'16 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP ROSE 2.73 PER CENT M-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery moved upward US$ 1.45 (3.04 %) per ton month over month.
A commodity ...
Sunday, 27 September 15
THE PANAMAX INDEX FELL 1.19 PCT WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI closed Friday (25/09/2015) at 943 points, down by 17 points compared to previous Friday closing (18/09/2015). The BDI wa ...
Friday, 25 September 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FOR THE WEEK ENDING SEPTEMBER 19 ROSE 2.5% PER CENT W-W
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.8 million shor ...
Wednesday, 23 September 15
CAPESIZE: SPOT RATES HAVE INCREASED MORE THAN 70 PER CENT DURING LAST WEEK
Dry Bulk owners, always look at September as the time that the market “signals” what lies ahead for the remainder of the year. The Chin ...
|
|
|
Showing 2796 to 2800 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The University of Queensland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
|
| |
| |
|
