We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 13 November 15
WEAK CHINA POWER DEMAND DAMPENS COAL CONSUMPTION - FITCH
The weak growth in China's electricity consumption in 2015, together with increasing non-thermal power generation capacity are exerting more pr ...
Friday, 13 November 15
DRY BULK, IT IS HARD TO MAINTAIN AN OPTIMISTIC VIEW FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The dry bulk owners looking for cover remained under pressure for size segments across the board. With Capes closing off the week as ...
Friday, 13 November 15
WEEKLY US COAL PRODUCTION DECLINES TO 16.5 MMST; SLIDE 14.9% Y-Y: EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.5 million shor ...
Thursday, 12 November 15
FOREIGN COAL MINE ACQUISITION - STRATEGY VERSUS OPPORTUNITY FOR INDIAN UTILITIES - DIPESH DIPU
The acquisition market for thermal coal assets abroad is dull. Sellers of all hues are in the market; some are actively scouting for buyers while o ...
Thursday, 12 November 15
PORT OF NEWCASTLE'S COAL EXPORT VOLUME UP IN OCTOBER 2015
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $1.254 billio ...
|
|
|
Showing 2716 to 2720 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
