We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 November 15
Q3' 16 RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP LOST 15.47% SINCE 6 AUGUST; 18.65% SINCE 6 MAY
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1’ 2016 declined week over week and month over month.
The Q1’ 2016 &nb ...
Wednesday, 11 November 15
VESSEL VALUES ARE DOWN BY AT LEAST 20% SINCE MID-AUGUST - INTERMODAL
I had promised not to spend another broker’s insight focusing on the dry bulk side. However, the sale of the M/V Churchill Bulker (179,362 dw ...
Tuesday, 10 November 15
SELF-HEATING OF COAL HAS EMPHASISED THE IMPORTANCE OF CHECKING THE ACCURACY OF SHIPPER'S DECLARATIONS - GARD
Recent incidents involving self-heating of coal has emphasised the importance of checking the accuracy of shipper’s declarations for all type ...
Tuesday, 10 November 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP SLIDES CONTINUE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2016 delivery slid $3.55 per ton (8.50%) month over month to US$ 38.20 per ton. The swap ...
Monday, 09 November 15
BUNKER PRICES TO KEEP SLIDING THIS WEEK, EXPERT SAYS - MARINE BUNKER EXCHANGE
The oil price volatility has continued this week. Two dollars up one day and the next day two dollars down. The oil market has been trading on the ...
|
|
|
Showing 2721 to 2725 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Planning Commission, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
