We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 November 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA THERMAL COAL SWAP FOR Q3' 16 CONTRACT DECLINED US$ 4 PER TON
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2016 delivery declined US$ 4.35 (9.03 %) per ton month over month.
A commodity swa ...
Monday, 09 November 15
INDIAN THERMAL COAL IMPORTS SURGED 18%; COKING COAL 6.31% DURING APRIL-OCTOBER: BUSINESS-STANDARD
Indian thermal coal imports surged 18% at the country's top 12 major ports to 55.90 million tonnes (MT) in the first seven months of the curren ...
Sunday, 08 November 15
THE FREIGHT MARKET KEEP DROPPING THIS WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The freight market keep dropping this week.
The BDI down 12.48 percent week on week and closed at 631 points on 6 November 2015. ...
Sunday, 08 November 15
CAPESIZE FREIGHT RATES IN AUSTRALIA-CHINA ROUTES OVER 50% CHEAPER THAN BRAZIL-CHINA ROUTE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
China’s mining and steel industries are facing tectonic shifts over the past couple of years, with the country’s limiting of coal use, ...
Friday, 06 November 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FELL SHARPLY FOR THE WEEK ENDING OCTOBER 31
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.6 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2726 to 2730 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|
