We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 November 15
CHINA STEEL PRODUCTION CAPACITY TO PEAK IN 2016 - FITCH RATINGS
COALspot.com: Fitch Ratings today says that China's steel production capacity is likely to peak in 2016, with capacity elimination over the nex ...
Thursday, 19 November 15
Q3' 16 RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP CLOSED 9% LOWER THAN Q1' 16 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1’ 2016 up week over week and month over month.
The Q1’ 2016 swa ...
Thursday, 19 November 15
RATES FOR CAPES KEPT MOVING SOUTH - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: With the BDI currently standing at less than 30 points above the historical lows marked in February this year and with activity acros ...
Wednesday, 18 November 15
MARKET (SHIPPING) INSIGHT - THEODORE NTALAKOS
Supply VS Demand
According to data from the IMF, global growth for 2015 is projected at 3.1 percent, 0.3 percentage point lower than in 2014, ...
Tuesday, 17 November 15
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR (SEMI) ANTHRACITE COAL FOR SEOCHEON POWER PLANT
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 70,000 Metric Tons of (Semi) Anthracite for Ja ...
|
|
|
Showing 2706 to 2710 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Australian Coal Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The University of Queensland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
