We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 24 January 16
PANAMAX MARKET WEAKENS ACROSS THE BOARD
COALspot.com: The Baltic Dry Index, which gauges the cost of shipping dry bulk including iron ore, cement, grain, coal and fertiliser, fell ninetee ...
Friday, 22 January 16
WEEKLY US COAL PRODUCTION ESTIMATES ALMOST FLAT
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.3 million shor ...
Friday, 22 January 16
COAL PRICES TO REMAIN UNDER PRESSURE THIS YEAR
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap delivery Q1 2016 declined month on month and week over week. The falling trend of prices for coal was continuing ...
Friday, 22 January 16
Q3' 16 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 40.80; DECLINE $ 2.80 M-O-M
COALspot.com: Q1’ 2016 API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap up month over month and decline week over week.
The Q1’ 2016 FOB Richards B ...
Wednesday, 20 January 16
Q3'16 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED $ 2.40 LESSER THAN Q1'16 CLOSING PRICE OF $ 38.10
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2016 delivery rose another $0.77 per ton (2.06%) this past week compared to the sam ...
|
|
|
Showing 2596 to 2600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The University of Queensland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
