We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 January 16
Q3'16 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP DROPPED BELOW $41 A TON
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2016 delivery rose US$ 0.82 (1.94%) per ton month over month.
A commodity swap is ...
Tuesday, 26 January 16
OUTLOOK FOR GLOBAL OIL MARKETS - OPEC SECRETARY GENERAL
Opening address by HE Abdalla S. El-Badri, OPEC Secretary General, at the Chatham House Conference: Middle East and North Africa Energy 2016, Theme ...
Monday, 25 January 16
5700 GAR COAL INDEX CLOSED $ 50.08 PER TON, $0.20 LOWER FROM LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin decline 1.35 percent week over week to averaging $39.39 per ton on this past Friday, ...
Monday, 25 January 16
SHOULD A DEFAULTING PARTY BE ENTITLED TO AN INNOCENT PARTY'S SAVING, FOLLOWING THEIR BREACH OF CONTRACT? - THE NEW FLAMENCO REVISITED
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
This case was addressed by the club in our of January 2015, when the High Court decision became available. The background ...
Monday, 25 January 16
DRY BULK SHIPPING: A MISERABLE START TO A NEW YEAR, WHERE THE MARKET STRUGGLES TO GROW AT ALL - BIMCO
The global production of steel dropped in 2015 compared to 2014, to a larger extent outside China, as China exported its surplus of steel to destin ...
|
|
|
Showing 2591 to 2595 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
