We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 January 16
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - NASOS SOULAKIS
If you believe in the “January effect”, the theory according to which the beginning of a new year has a positive effect on financial in ...
Tuesday, 19 January 16
HAPPY NEW YEAR, COAL PRODUCERS! OR MAYBE NOT - ANDY ROBERTS
To coal producers, 2015 must have seemed far longer than 365 days. From their perspective, as bad as markets were at the beginning of the year, and ...
Tuesday, 19 January 16
COALTRANS ASIA IS RETURNING TO BALI
22nd Coaltrans Asia
Coaltrans Asia is returning to Bali to bring together over 1000 industry decision makers and thought leaders for three day ...
Monday, 18 January 16
INDONESIAN 5700 GAR COAL INDEX ROSE 0.60% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin decline slightly week over week to averaging $39.93 per ton on this past Friday, acc ...
Monday, 18 January 16
BALTIC DRY SHIPPING INDEX DROPS TO 373 POINTS; DECLINE 13% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market dropped this week as the BDI declined further 13 percent to 373 points week over week. The Cape index ...
|
|
|
Showing 2601 to 2605 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
|
| |
| |
|
