We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 28 January 16
WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR COAL IN LIGHT OF THE PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT? - GERMAN COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION
This depends – says the VDKi – to a very great extent on who you want to believe more, the United Nations or the International Energy A ...
Thursday, 28 January 16
RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS FOR Q1,Q2 AND Q3 DELIVERIES FIRM THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Q1’ 2016 API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap rose month over month and week over week.
The Q1’ 2016 FOB Richards Bay Coa ...
Wednesday, 27 January 16
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS CLOSE MIXED
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2016 delivery rose another $1.17 per ton (3.13%) this past week compared to the sam ...
Wednesday, 27 January 16
CHINA'S STALLING ECONOMY HAS HAD A GREAT EFFECT ON VARIOUS COMMODITIES; DECREASED DEMAND DRIVING COMMODITY PRICES LOWER AND LOWER - LINOS ALEXANDROS KOGEVINAS
Having gone through the first few weeks of 2016, it’s starting to look like another challenging year is ahead of us. Hopes for a recovery in ...
Wednesday, 27 January 16
WORLD HARD COAL PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION DECLINE IN 2015 FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER A DECADE - VDKI
COALspot.com: Seaborne hard coal trade and the changes in this area were decisively affected by China and India - VDKi.
China bears the g ...
|
|
|
Showing 2586 to 2590 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
