We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 04 February 16
CAPESIZE: WEST AUSTRALIAN TO CHINA HAS BEEN CONCLUDED AT US$ 2.85 PMT AND THE C3 MARKET REMAINS INACTIVE - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
As everyone is getting ready for the Chinese new year, already depressed rates are under further pressure.
According to Fearnleys, ...
Wednesday, 03 February 16
DRY BULK MARKET CONTINUES TO BE UNDER PRESSURE - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market continues to be under pressure, with the BDI remaining in search of even the slightest support, which seems to be delaying more ...
Tuesday, 02 February 16
RECORD EXPORTS THROUGH SOUTH AFRICA'S RICHARDS BAY COAL TERMINAL MADE AT EXPENSE OF SMALLER RIVALS, IHS SAYS
Five percent increase in coal exports through South Africa’s dominant Richards Bay Coal Terminal in 2015 unlikely to accelerate country&rsquo ...
Tuesday, 02 February 16
SETTING ASIDE, STRIKING OUT AND APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL IN SHIP ARRESTS - RAJAH & TANN ASIA LLP
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The Singapore Court of Appeal once again has had to grapple with ship arrest, setting aside and appeals to the Court unde ...
Monday, 01 February 16
DRY BULK SUFFERS FROM POSEIDON'S POTENT PRONGS - CLARKSONS
It has been a grim start to 2016 for the bulkcarrier market, with the Baltic Dry Index sliding to new record lows on almost every day of the year s ...
|
|
|
Showing 2576 to 2580 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
