We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 10 February 16
OWNERS APPEAR WILLING TO DISPOSE OF TONNAGE THE SOONEST IT HITS THE 10 YEAR MARK - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
COALspot.com: The last two months of 2015 made a case for traditional shipowners to invest in the dry bulk sector, doing so though based purely on ...
Monday, 08 February 16
DRY-BULK SHIPPING DIVING DEEP
COALspot.com: The freight markets continued to fall this past week.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) of dry-bulk shipping freights, a measure of glo ...
Monday, 08 February 16
DRY BULK: SHIPBROKER SEES BDI MARKET REACHING LOW POINT OF 236 POINTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The endless pit that is the dry bulk market over the past two months, has been the issue of debate among ship owners, shipbroker and analysts alike ...
Friday, 05 February 16
COAL INDIA EYES COAL MINES IN SOUTH AFRICA - PTI
“Coal India Ltd has plans of acquiring coal mines in South Africa,” an official said. It is looking at acquiring mines in partnership w ...
Friday, 05 February 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT ROSE 4.2% TO 13.6 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.6 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2571 to 2575 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Planning Commission, India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
|
| |
| |
|
