We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 12 February 16
DRY BULK MARKET'S FORTUNES STILL TIED WITH CHINA'S ECONOMY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The inevitable slowdown of the Chinese economy was expected to hurt dry bulk shipping, but few expected the blow to be this hard, especially given ...
Friday, 12 February 16
COAL PRICES ARE EXPECTED TO DECLINE 13% IN 2016 TO $50 ATON, ON CONTINUED WEAK DEMAND AND OVERSUPPLY - WORLD BANK
COALspot.com: Thermal coal prices fell 9 percent in the fourth quarter on continued weak demand, high stocks, and surplus production, World Bank sa ...
Friday, 12 February 16
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION OFF 5.4% FROM LAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 12.9 million shor ...
Thursday, 11 February 16
GLOBAL NEWBUILDING ORDERBOOK IS SHRINKING ON A DAILY BASIS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
2016 has started right where 2015 left off when it comes to newbuilding ordering activity, i.e. there are slim pickings to be had from shipyards ar ...
Wednesday, 10 February 16
SOUTH AFRICA IS HOPING TO SHIP MORE COAL TO INDIA IN 2016
COALspot.com: South Africa is hoping to boost coal exports to India after shipping a record 75.4 million tonnes of coal in 2015, industry officials ...
|
|
|
Showing 2566 to 2570 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- White Energy Company Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Coal Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
