We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 19 February 16
INDONESIAN HBA HITS A NEW LOWS BELOW $51 A TON AS OVERSUPPLY, LOW DEMAND WOES PERSIST
COALspot.com: Low coal demand and excess supplies sent Indonesian benchmark coal price further deep in February 2016. HBA has slumped second time t ...
Friday, 19 February 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION ROSE 2.6% FROM LAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.2 million shor ...
Thursday, 18 February 16
INDIA NEEDS INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ON HIGH EFFICIENCY COAL - WORLD COAL ASSOCIATION
Speaking at a conference in New Delhi today, World Coal Association Chief Executive Benjamin Sporton said the critical role of coal in driving econ ...
Thursday, 18 February 16
CHINA COAL SECTOR - 2015 RESULTS BLEAK, 2016 UNLIKELY TO BE ANY BETTER - FITCH
COALspot.com: China Coal Sector’s Financial Woes to Worsen in 2016.
Fitch Ratings says that the 2015 full-year result previews issued by ...
Thursday, 18 February 16
PANAMAX RATES OUT OF ECSA WERE STILL GAINING A PREMIUM OVER THE REST OF THE MARKET - INTERMODAL
The BDI moved further down last week, fact that hardly took anyone by surprise as the lunar year holidays in Asia on top of the already depre ...
|
|
|
Showing 2556 to 2560 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
|
| |
| |
|
