We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 01 March 16
CAN BULKCARRIER SUPPLY CUTS RESTORE SOME BALANCE? - CLARKSONS
The easing in bulkcarrier deliveries and the accelerated pace of demolition in recent years has seen bulkcarrier fleet growth slow from a rapid 17% ...
Monday, 29 February 16
BALTIC INDEX INCHES UP THIS PAST WEEK AS SMALLER VESSELS LEND SUPPORT
COALspot.com: The freight markets rose slightly this past week.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) of dry-bulk shipping freights, a measure of global ...
Monday, 29 February 16
LOSS OF EARNINGS IN THE WAKE OF A COLLISION - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A shipowner’s loss of earnings can form a significant part of a collision claim. Awareness of the ways of calculati ...
Friday, 26 February 16
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP SLIGHTLY
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.4 million shor ...
Thursday, 25 February 16
DRY BULKERS ARE SCRAPPED AT RECORD PACE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The newbuilding market is at a lull these days, as ship owners are focusing on two fronts, getting rid of excess dry bulk tonnage and snapping up b ...
|
|
|
Showing 2546 to 2550 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Planning Commission, India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The University of Queensland
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- VISA Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
