We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 07 March 16
INDONESIAN 5700 GAR COAL INDEX DECLINE $0.05 A TON WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin decline 0.28 percent week over week to averaging $38.66 per ton on this past Friday, ...
Monday, 07 March 16
FREIGHT MARKET MOVING POSITIVE; ALL SEGMENTS EXCEPT CAPE SHOWING A FIRM TREND
COALspot.com: The freight market was steady this past week and showing a firm trend for all segments except for Cape index.
The Baltic Dry Ind ...
Friday, 04 March 16
GLOBAL ECONOMY'S JITTERS ARE SLOWING DOWN SHIPPING EVEN FURTHER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The global economy’s shaky condition to say the least is now hampering growth and as a result demand for shipping is slowing down, something ...
Friday, 04 March 16
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED 109.3 MMST; 30.2% LOWER THAN THE COMPARABLE YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION IN 2015 - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.1 million shor ...
Thursday, 03 March 16
INDIA'S BUDGET NOT ENOUGH TO BOOST STEELMAKERS' PROFITABILITY - FITCH RATINGS
COALspot.com: Fitch Ratings says that increase in proposed infrastructure spending in India's latest government budget is unlikely to provide a ...
|
|
|
Showing 2536 to 2540 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The University of Queensland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Coal Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
