We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 03 March 16
BDI FURTHER STRENGTHENING; THE INCREASE IN RATES WAS NOT SUBSTANTIAL
COALspot.com: The BDI closed off on a positive note for a second week in a row, further strengthening the belief that the market might be bottoming ...
Thursday, 03 March 16
RIO TINTO COMPLETES SALE OF INTEREST IN BENGALLA JOINT VENTURE FOR US$616.7 MILLION
COALspot.com: Rio Tinto has completed the sale of its 40 per cent interest in the Bengalla coal Joint Venture in Australia to New Hope Corporation ...
Wednesday, 02 March 16
RE-EVALUATION OF MINING LICENSES CLEAN AND CLEAR STATUS IN INDONESIA
COALspot.com: In connection with the transfer of mining authority from Regents/Mayors to Governors1 and from Regents/Mayors and Governors to t ...
Wednesday, 02 March 16
OIL MY GOD.....!!!!
OIL my GOD….!!!!
The oil price “crash” that started in 2014 was caused by a glut of practically unwanted oil. Producers had be ...
Tuesday, 01 March 16
CS 42 (4200 GAR) COAL INDEX CLOSED AT US$ 27.11 A TON ON 26 FEBRUARY
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin decline 0.31 percent week over week to averaging $38.77 per ton on this past Friday, ...
|
|
|
Showing 2541 to 2545 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
|
| |
| |
|
