We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 11 March 16
ADANI GLOBAL BAGS 0.26 MILLION TONS OF COAL CONTRACT FROM LANKA COAL COMPANY
COALspot.com: Lanka Coal Company (Private) Limited, Sri Lanka has awarded 260,000 +/- 10% tons of Power plant 6300 GAR calorific value coal to Adan ...
Friday, 11 March 16
US WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION DOWN BY 0.5 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 12.6 million shor ...
Friday, 11 March 16
FORTESCUE'S MOU WITH VALE COULD STRENGTHEN ITS BUSINESS PROFILE - FITCH
COALspot.com: Fitch Ratings says that Australia-based Fortescue Metals Group Limited's (BB+/Negative) memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Br ...
Thursday, 10 March 16
CHINA'S NEW POLICY PLAN COULD BE POSITIVE FOR SHIPPING, BUT TARGETS SEEM RATHER AMBITIOUS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
China set out its new policy plan during the course of the past weekend, but it seems to have set some very ambitious goals, which could be difficu ...
Thursday, 10 March 16
U.S. COAL EXPORTS DECLINED 23% IN 2015, AS COAL IMPORTS REMAINED STEADY
COALspot.com: The United States remains a net exporter of coal, exporting 74.0 million short tons (MMst) and importing 11 MMst in 2015.
Accord ...
|
|
|
Showing 2526 to 2530 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
