We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 16 September 22
WHEN IS A VESSEL'S INCOME EARNING CAPACITY AT RISK? 'CONTROLLED INCOME CAN BE A KEY OF SUCCESS' - MARASCO MARINE
Managing marine risks is not an easy task, which requires special knowledge and expertise on the subject per se. Customarily, big ship management c ...
Friday, 16 September 22
DRY BULK MARKET: EU’S BAN ON RUSSIAN COAL LIFTS DEMAND DESPITE ECONOMIC HEADWINDS - BIMCO
Highlights
– The Baltic Exchange Dry Index (BDI) peaked in late May and has since fallen sharply as lower Chinese demand and adverse glob ...
Friday, 16 September 22
BIMCO EMBARKS ON NEW STANDARD FOR “QUIET ENJOYMENT”
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A newly set-up BIMCO drafting team involving a cross-section of shipowners, charterers, financing and leasing i ...
Friday, 16 September 22
INDIAN COAL PRODUCTION TO RISE 150 PER CENT IN 10 YEARS: CENTRE - EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE
The Union Ministry of Mines is expecting 150 per cent growth in coal production 10 years down the line as a result of coal reforms that had been us ...
Thursday, 15 September 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
While the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies agreed on a 100,000 b/d output cut last week, oil flows are in the spotlight ...
|
|
|
Showing 236 to 240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
|
| |
| |
|
