We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 20 September 22
CHINA COAL OUTPUT UP 8.1 PCT IN AUGUST - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output posted stable expansion in August, official data showed.
The country produced 370 million tonnes of ra ...
Monday, 19 September 22
BUMA AUSTRALIA AWARDED A$400 MILLION CONTRACT EXTENSION BY BMA FOR GOONYELLA PROJECT
Press Release – PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. (the "Company") announced that its subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama ("BUMA ...
Saturday, 17 September 22
CHINA WARNS COAL COMPANIES AGAINST DUAL CONTRACTS, KEEP PRICES STABLE - REUTERS
China’s state economic planner warned coal companies operating at ports in the Bohai Bay region to comply with their long-term contracts to k ...
Saturday, 17 September 22
IS A GLOBAL RECESSION IMMINENT? - WORLD BANK
Since the beginning of the year, a rapid deterioration of growth prospects coupled with rising inflation and tightening financing conditions, has i ...
Saturday, 17 September 22
FITCH RATINGS REVISES GLOBAL METALS & MINING PRICE ASSUMPTIONS
Fitch Ratings has revised its metals and mining price assumptions reflecting evolving economic growth expectations and demand and supply dynamics.
...
|
|
|
Showing 231 to 235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|
