We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 23 September 22
CHINA DIGS DEEP TO RAISE COAL OUTPUT TO RECORD HIGH - REUTERS
China’s coal production has surged this year as the government seeks to improve energy security by reducing dependence on imports and amassin ...
Friday, 23 September 22
EUROPEAN STEEL BUYERS SEEK DIRECTION IN VOLATILE MARKET - MEPS INTERNATIONAL
Demand for steel is slow to recover, after the summer break. Mill production costs continue to increase. Steel purchasers are uncertain about the f ...
Friday, 23 September 22
BUOYANT COAL INDUSTRY SEEKS WAYS TO STAY IN THE LONG-TERM ENERGY MIX - REUTERS
There’s no doubt that the global coal industry has been a major beneficiary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent energy c ...
Friday, 23 September 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
In view of the forthcoming winter, Europe is trying to escape from its energy (oil & gas) dependency from Russia to ensure energy abundance eve ...
Tuesday, 20 September 22
CHINA'S DAILY COAL OUTPUT HITS 3-MONTH LOW IN AUGUST ON RAINS, COVID CURBS - REUTERS
China’s daily coal output in August slipped to a three-month low as some mines in its biggest coal mining regions reduced operations or even ...
|
|
|
Showing 226 to 230 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Coal Association
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
