We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 12 September 22
COAL PRICE HIKE REMAINS DIFFICULT FOR CIL: CHAIRMAN TELLS ANALYSTS - PTI
Coal India on Thursday informed investors that increasing coal prices remains difficult in the current context when the economy is grappling with h ...
Friday, 09 September 22
GREECE WILL KEEP COAL-FIRED PLANTS RUNNING FOR LONGER AMID GAS CRISIS - REUTERS
Greece will keep seven coal-fired plants running for longer than previously planned as European countries adjust to a cut in gas flows coming from ...
Friday, 09 September 22
CHINA'S DROUGHT INTENSIFIES GLOBAL COAL SHORTAGE - REUTERS
China’s drought has sent coal prices surging as traders anticipate the lack of hydroelectric generation will force it to burn more coal to me ...
Thursday, 08 September 22
MOODY.S AFFIRMS ABM INVESTAMA'S B1 RATINGS FOLLOWING PLANNED MINORITY INVESTMENT IN COAL MINER; OUTLOOK STABLE
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed ABM Investama Tbk (P.T.)'s B1 corporate family rating (CFR), along with the B1 rating on its senior ...
Thursday, 08 September 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
While the energy markets are historically stretched, Russian flows of crude oil are closely monitored as the oil trade is ultimately realigned. Mor ...
|
|
|
Showing 241 to 245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Planning Commission, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
