We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 August 16
DRY BULK VESSELS FACE CONTINUED DISTRESS - CLEAR ASSET
Dry bulk vessels have faced extreme distress in recent years. With a combination of factors including newer vessels being ordered with up to 5-year ...
Tuesday, 23 August 16
4200 GAR COAL INDEX CLIMB 15.96% YEAR TO DATE - CS COAL INDEX
COALspot.com: Average 4200 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin rose 1.65 % week over week to averaging $31.46 per ton this past week, shows CS (i) ...
Tuesday, 23 August 16
KOMIPO TO IMPORT 250K OF 5,700 KCAL/KG NAR COAL FOR Q4' 16
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender for total 250,000 Metric Tons of Bituminous Coal for ...
Monday, 22 August 16
INDONESIA'S CS 5000 GAR THERMAL COAL INDEX, ROSE TO A 57-WEEKS HIGH TO TOP $43.47 A TON
COALspot.com: Indonesia’s CS 5000 GAR thermal coal index, rose to a 57-weeks high to top $US43. 47 a ton in the latest week, extending a 18-w ...
Monday, 22 August 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS STEADY THIS PAST WEEK; CAPE INDEX DECLINE 5.38%
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose and ending in a positive note this past week except ...
|
|
|
Showing 2311 to 2315 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Australian Coal Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
