We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 06 October 22
COAL INDIA ASKED TO ENHANCE SUPPLY TO THERMAL POWER PLANTS - IANS
With the festival season round the corner, Coal India Ltd. has been directed by the government to scale up dispatch to thermal power plants.
&n ...
Wednesday, 05 October 22
BUNKER PRICES DOWN AGAIN; IS THERE MORE TO COME? - INTEGR8 FUELS
It’s the economy…..”
VLSFO prices are now back to levels at the start of this year. After all the extremes of thi ...
Wednesday, 05 October 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Amid the looming western sanctions on Russia, the country is challenged to pivot its energy markets away from Europe and toward the East. Yet, Russ ...
Tuesday, 04 October 22
A REMARKABLE SHIFT IN FORTUNES HAS BEEN NOTED IN THE CRUDE OIL TANKER MARKETS - ALLIED SHIPPING
A remarkable shift in fortunes has been noted in the crude oil tanker markets over the past month, yet despite these shifts being seemingly in thei ...
Tuesday, 04 October 22
OIL PRICES COULD SOON RETURN TO $100 AS OPEC+ CONSIDERS ‘HISTORIC’ CUT, ANALYSTS SAY - CNBC
An influential alliance of some of the world’s most powerful oil producers is reportedly considering their largest output cut since the start ...
|
|
|
Showing 216 to 220 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
