We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 October 16
INDONESIA'S DEMAND FOR COAL REMAINS STRONG: BP
Indonesia's domestic demand for coal shows no sign of slowing down as the country is banking on its coal abundance to meet the country' ...
Friday, 07 October 16
CEYLON SHIPPING CORPORATION HAS TAKEN DELIVERY OF COAL CARRIER MV.CEYLON PRINCESS
Sri Lanka’s Ceylon Shipping Corporation (CSC) has taken delivery of its second newly built bulk carrier for the transportation of coal to pow ...
Friday, 07 October 16
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION TOTALLED AN ESTIMATED 540.5 MMST; DOWN 21.9% Y-O-Y, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.7 million short ton ...
Thursday, 06 October 16
SHIPS IN PACIFIC ACHIEVE JUST ABOVE $10K DAILY FOR A BRAZIL ROUND VOYAGE - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Slower week with limited activity due to holidays in the East. Mixed feelings within different markets, with slight downturn in Pacific ...
Wednesday, 05 October 16
OPEC TO SHUT OFF MORE THAN 6 PERCENT OF ITS PRODUCTION; MIXED FEELING AMONGST TRADERS - ALLIED
OPEC recent accord to shut off more than 6 percent of its production this past week has been met with mixed feeling amongst traders. As we mo ...
|
|
|
Showing 2261 to 2265 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- White Energy Company Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
